One look at the photo and it tells you everything you need to know about the Boston Marathon bombings.
It was a horrific attack against our way of life.
But, by choosing to put a bloodied child on the cover, did Time go too far?
Was the kid's picture used purely for shock value? Or was it the one picture that told the story?
It is likely that the use of this picture will be debated about. How would you have felt if it was your kid?
The one thing for certain, is people will be talking about it....and maybe that's what Time was going for. You can leave your thoughts in the comments below (no need to register) just type what you have to say and hit Post.